<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Drop the Hammer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com</link>
	<description>Drop the Hammer with Ed Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fluorescent Lamp Timeline by KImberly Janeway</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>KImberly Janeway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/2008/01/29/this-test/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Hello. I&#039;m a reporter with Consumer Reports and would like to interview you by phone today, August 19, or tomorrow. 
Thank you.
Kimberly Janeway 
914/378-2628</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. I&#8217;m a reporter with Consumer Reports and would like to interview you by phone today, August 19, or tomorrow.<br />
Thank you.<br />
Kimberly Janeway<br />
914/378-2628</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CFL &#8216;On-Time&#8217; and Safety by Allison Hopper</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=13&#038;cpage=1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Hopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=13#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr.Edward Hammer,
I am working on an educational program for HS students that explores the spiral form, and how it can be used in design projects. I would like to send you a proposal to look over. 
Thanks! 
Allison Hopper

PS My husband is also an inventor and member if IEEE.  His name is Martin Gersten, website: gerstenkoplin.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr.Edward Hammer,<br />
I am working on an educational program for HS students that explores the spiral form, and how it can be used in design projects. I would like to send you a proposal to look over.<br />
Thanks!<br />
Allison Hopper</p>
<p>PS My husband is also an inventor and member if IEEE.  His name is Martin Gersten, website: gerstenkoplin.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More CFL History by Paul Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=10&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/2008/03/31/more-cfl-history/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed.

I got your name from one of my sales reps. I am looking for someone who can explain to me that the T5HO lamp is not as efficient as everyone makes it out to be. I met a guy a couple of years ago and he showed me a bell curve, I can not quite remember the details, but anyhow, there is something about the way we measure the performance of the lamp in a lab versus in the field and also something with the draw from the ballasts to power the lamp. We use a lot of compact flourescent lamps. Perhpas you know of a paper that has been written on this subject that I could review for myself?

I appreciate your help. My company is Voigt Lighting we are in Garfield, NJ, phone number is 973.928.2252. My e mail is paul@voigtlighting.com.

thx,
paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed.</p>
<p>I got your name from one of my sales reps. I am looking for someone who can explain to me that the T5HO lamp is not as efficient as everyone makes it out to be. I met a guy a couple of years ago and he showed me a bell curve, I can not quite remember the details, but anyhow, there is something about the way we measure the performance of the lamp in a lab versus in the field and also something with the draw from the ballasts to power the lamp. We use a lot of compact flourescent lamps. Perhpas you know of a paper that has been written on this subject that I could review for myself?</p>
<p>I appreciate your help. My company is Voigt Lighting we are in Garfield, NJ, phone number is 973.928.2252. My e mail is <a href="mailto:paul@voigtlighting.com" class="external">paul@voigtlighting.com</a>.</p>
<p>thx,<br />
paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High Frequency Ballasts by Chris Lauwerys</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lauwerys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/2008/04/10/high-frequency-ballasts/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

I tried to find an email address for you on your blog but no luck. 

I work for a corporate communications consultancy in the UK and I wanted to sound you out about a project that I&#039;m working on.

Could you let me know the best way to get in touch so that I can send you a bit more information?

My email address is chris.lauwerys@bluerubicon.com. Perhaps you might send me yours, then I reply to you.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I tried to find an email address for you on your blog but no luck. </p>
<p>I work for a corporate communications consultancy in the UK and I wanted to sound you out about a project that I&#8217;m working on.</p>
<p>Could you let me know the best way to get in touch so that I can send you a bit more information?</p>
<p>My email address is <a href="mailto:chris.lauwerys@bluerubicon.com" class="external">chris.lauwerys@bluerubicon.com</a>. Perhaps you might send me yours, then I reply to you.</p>
<p>I look forward to hearing from you.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fluorescent Lamp Timeline by Ed Hammer</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/2008/01/29/this-test/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Wyndsor,

Thank you for the questions.  You will find my answers below.

&lt;strong&gt;Question:
Why didn&#039;t GE sell cfl&#039;s right away in the 70&#039;s? &lt;/strong&gt;

Answer:
GE Lighting had already made a major decision to develop a low wattage (20 watt HID) high intensity discharge lamp and could not afford to develop both types of lamps at the same time because of the large developmental capital expense. In the long run, that certainly did not prove to be the best decision but even big companies don&#039;t always predict the future correctly.

&lt;strong&gt;Question:
Did you know mercury was hazardous when you first invented them?&lt;/strong&gt;

Answer:
All 92 elements in the Periodic Table can be hazardous to your health if used inappropriately. In the case of fluorescent lamps, the element of mercury itself is not normally hazardous to health unless directly digested. However, if the mercury then comes into contact with water, it can become soluble. But even soluble mercury is not hazardous unless bacteria convert it to methyl mercury. Fish can then digest the methyl mercury and it then can get into the food chain. On a health scale of 1 to 10, I rate radioactive elements in category 10  and fluorescent lamps in category 1.

&lt;strong&gt;Question:
Have cfls changed from your original design?&lt;/strong&gt; 

Answer:
No, my original CFL lamp is on display in the Smithsonian Institute and basically looks like the present day TCP product.

&lt;strong&gt;Question:
Was their another substance you could put in cfls besides mercury?&lt;/strong&gt;

Answer:
No, mercury is the best element to use because it has the best ultraviolet resonance radiation that excites the phosphor to produce visible light. It is Mother Nature&#039;s first choice. I have made inert lamps without mercury but they are only marginally more efficient than incandescent lamps.

&lt;strong&gt;Question:
Was it your idea to put mercury in cfls?&lt;/strong&gt; 

Answer:
Yes, but remember that mercury has been used in all fluorescent lamps since they were first introduced at the New York World&#039;s Fair in 1939. 

Thank you and keep asking your questions because that is the way to make the world a better place for all of us. 

Many thanks - Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wyndsor,</p>
<p>Thank you for the questions.  You will find my answers below.</p>
<p><strong>Question:<br />
Why didn&#8217;t GE sell cfl&#8217;s right away in the 70&#8242;s? </strong></p>
<p>Answer:<br />
GE Lighting had already made a major decision to develop a low wattage (20 watt HID) high intensity discharge lamp and could not afford to develop both types of lamps at the same time because of the large developmental capital expense. In the long run, that certainly did not prove to be the best decision but even big companies don&#8217;t always predict the future correctly.</p>
<p><strong>Question:<br />
Did you know mercury was hazardous when you first invented them?</strong></p>
<p>Answer:<br />
All 92 elements in the Periodic Table can be hazardous to your health if used inappropriately. In the case of fluorescent lamps, the element of mercury itself is not normally hazardous to health unless directly digested. However, if the mercury then comes into contact with water, it can become soluble. But even soluble mercury is not hazardous unless bacteria convert it to methyl mercury. Fish can then digest the methyl mercury and it then can get into the food chain. On a health scale of 1 to 10, I rate radioactive elements in category 10  and fluorescent lamps in category 1.</p>
<p><strong>Question:<br />
Have cfls changed from your original design?</strong> </p>
<p>Answer:<br />
No, my original CFL lamp is on display in the Smithsonian Institute and basically looks like the present day TCP product.</p>
<p><strong>Question:<br />
Was their another substance you could put in cfls besides mercury?</strong></p>
<p>Answer:<br />
No, mercury is the best element to use because it has the best ultraviolet resonance radiation that excites the phosphor to produce visible light. It is Mother Nature&#8217;s first choice. I have made inert lamps without mercury but they are only marginally more efficient than incandescent lamps.</p>
<p><strong>Question:<br />
Was it your idea to put mercury in cfls?</strong> </p>
<p>Answer:<br />
Yes, but remember that mercury has been used in all fluorescent lamps since they were first introduced at the New York World&#8217;s Fair in 1939. </p>
<p>Thank you and keep asking your questions because that is the way to make the world a better place for all of us. </p>
<p>Many thanks &#8211; Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fluorescent Lamp Timeline by Wyndsor D</title>
		<link>http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyndsor D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drop-the-hammer.com/2008/01/29/this-test/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hello Mr Hammer,
I tried to post a note to you to see if I could interview you for my fourth grade project. Could you please answer the following questions?

Why didn&#039;t GE sell cfl`s right away in the 70`s?

Did you know mercury was hazardous when you first invented them?

Have cfls changed from your original design? 

Was their another substance you could put in cfls besides mercury?

Was it your idea to put mercury in cfls? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr Hammer,<br />
I tried to post a note to you to see if I could interview you for my fourth grade project. Could you please answer the following questions?</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t GE sell cfl`s right away in the 70`s?</p>
<p>Did you know mercury was hazardous when you first invented them?</p>
<p>Have cfls changed from your original design? </p>
<p>Was their another substance you could put in cfls besides mercury?</p>
<p>Was it your idea to put mercury in cfls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
